Flounder (Fillet, Meat) vs Tuna: Nutrition Guide



Flounder (fillet, meat) - calories, kcal, weight, nutrition
Flounder (fillet, meat) - calories, kcal, weight, nutrition

Flounder vs Tuna
Nutrition Facts

Flounder
Serving size:
  change
one flounder (175g)steak (175g)
5g10g15g20g30g40g50g60g80g100g120g140g160g180g200g220g250g300g350g400g450g500g600g700g800g900g1000g
1oz2oz3oz4oz5oz6oz7oz8oz10oz12oz15oz20oz25oz30oz35oz40oz50oz

Amount Per Serving:
Calories

% Daily Value

Total Fat g
0%

Cholesterol mg
0%

Sodium mg
0%

Total Carbohydrates g
0%

Dietary Fiber g
0%

Sugars g

Protein g
0%

Vitaminium C mg
0%

Calcium mg
0%

Iron mg
0%

Potassium mg
0%

* The % Daily Value (DV) shows how much a nutrient in one serving of food contributes to your total daily diet. A 2000-calorie daily intake is used as a general guideline for nutrition advice.
Tuna
Serving size:
  change
one tuna (125g)cup (150g)half cup (75g)cup of canned fish (225g)steak (125g)
5g10g15g20g30g40g50g60g80g100g120g140g160g180g200g220g250g300g350g400g450g500g600g700g800g900g1000g
1oz2oz3oz4oz5oz6oz7oz8oz10oz12oz15oz20oz25oz30oz35oz40oz50oz

Amount Per Serving:
Calories

% Daily Value

Total Fat g
0%

Cholesterol mg
0%

Sodium mg
0%

Total Carbohydrates g
0%

Dietary Fiber g
0%

Sugars g

Protein g
0%

Vitaminium C mg
0%

Calcium mg
0%

Iron mg
0%

Potassium mg
0%

* The % Daily Value (DV) shows how much a nutrient in one serving of food contributes to your total daily diet. A 2000-calorie daily intake is used as a general guideline for nutrition advice.

Flounder vs Tuna:
Protein, fat, carbs, minerals, vitamins per 100g


per 100gFlounder (fillet, meat)Tuna
Calories70 144
Fat1.93 g4.9 g
Protein12.41 g23.33 g
Water84.63 g68.09 g
Calcium21 mg8 mg
Iron0.18 mg1.02 mg
Magnessium18 mg50 mg
Phosphorus0.1 mg5.7 mg
Potassium160 mg252 mg
Sodium296 mg39 mg
Zink0.1 mg5.7 mg
Vitaminium A33 µg2183 µg
Vitaminium B1 (Thiamine)0.022 mg0.241 mg
Vitaminium B2 (riboflavin)0.02 mg0.251 mg
Vitaminium B3 (Niacin)1.04 mg8.654 mg
Vitaminium B60.098 mg0.455 mg
Vitaminium B9 (Folic acid)0.005 mg0.002 mg
Vitaminium E0.63 mg1 mg

Discover the Ocean's Delights: Flounder and Tuna

When it comes to the bounty of the sea, few dishes can rival the delicate taste and nutritional benefits of fish. Among the plethora of options, flounder and tuna stand out not just for their taste but also for their fascinating nature and health benefits. Let's dive into the world of these two remarkable fish and find out what makes them unique, both on the plate and beyond.

A Closer Look at Flounder

Flounder, with its distinct flat body and ability to blend into its surroundings, is as interesting as it is delicious. This bottom-dwelling fish is a master of camouflage, changing its color to match the ocean floor. When it comes to culinary delights, flounder fillets are highly prized for their light, delicate flavor and fine texture, making them a favorite among seafood lovers. Nutritionally, flounder is a low-calorie option rich in protein and essential nutrients, making it a smart choice for those looking to maintain a healthy diet.

The Mighty Tuna

Tuna, on the other hand, is a powerful swimmer known for its speed and endurance. These fish are capable of migrating across entire oceans, and their lean, meaty fillets have earned them a spot as one of the most sought-after catches. Tuna's rich, bold flavor and higher fat content make it a versatile ingredient, beloved in everything from sushi to grilled steaks. Beyond its taste, tuna offers a robust nutritional profile, packed with protein, vitamins, and minerals that are essential for a healthy body.

Nutritional Insights

When comparing the nutritional aspects of flounder and tuna, it's clear that both offer valuable benefits. Flounder, with only 70 calories per serving, is a lighter option, making it ideal for those watching their calorie intake. It's also lower in fat but doesn't skimp on protein, providing a substantial 12.41 grams per serving. Tuna, with 144 calories per serving, is higher in both protein and fat, including a significant amount of heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids. This makes tuna a great choice for those looking to support muscle growth and overall health.

Both fish are also rich in vitamins and minerals, though they shine in different areas. Tuna is an excellent source of vitamin A, B vitamins, and magnesium, contributing to energy production and immune function. Flounder, while more modest in its vitamin content, still provides essential nutrients like calcium and iron, important for bone health and oxygen transport.

Choosing Between Flounder and Tuna

So, how do you choose between flounder and tuna? The answer lies in your personal taste preferences and nutritional needs. If you prefer a lighter, milder fish, flounder is an excellent choice, especially for delicate dishes. Its low calorie and fat content make it a go-to for those mindful of their diet. Tuna, with its bold flavor and higher omega-3 content, is perfect for those looking for a nutrient-dense option to support an active lifestyle.

Ultimately, both flounder and tuna offer unique flavors and health benefits that make them worthy additions to any meal plan. Whether you're grilling a tuna steak or enjoying a flounder fillet sautéed in a light sauce, you're not just treating your taste buds—you're also nourishing your body.

In conclusion, the seas offer a wealth of culinary treasures, with flounder and tuna standing out as two of the most nutritious and delicious. Whether you're drawn to the gentle taste of flounder or the robust richness of tuna, incorporating these fish into your diet is a choice that's as wise for your health as it is delightful for your palate.

Flounder (fillet, meat) 100g

70kcal

Calories source

  • 0% CARBS.
  • 74% PROTEIN
  • 26% FAT

Tuna 100g

144kcal

Calories source

  • 0% CARBS
  • 68% PROTEIN
  • 32% FAT
Marcin Piotrowicz
Author of this page
Marcin Piotrowicz

calories-info.com creator
Healthy diet and healthy lifestyle promoter

All information about nutrition on this website was created with help of information from the official United States Department of Agriculture database.

Add comment