Burger (Burger King) vs Tartar Sauce: Nutrition Comparison

Where is more calories, protein, carbs - what is more healthy?


Burger (Burger King) - calories, kcal, weight, nutrition
Burger (Burger King) - calories, kcal, weight, nutrition

Tatar sauce vs Burger King hamburger: Nutrition Comparison

per 100gBurger (Burger King)Tartar sauce
Calories261 211
Carbohydrates26.76 g13.3 g
Fat10.55 g16.7 g
Dietary fiber1 g0.5 g
Protein14.85 g1 g
Water45.97 g67 g
Calcium76 mg26 mg
Iron2.87 mg0.25 mg
Magnessium25 mg6 mg
Phosphorus5.5 mg50.4 mg
Potassium217 mg68 mg
Sodium461 mg667 mg
Zink5.5 mg50.4 mg
Vitaminium B1 (Thiamine)0.334 mg0.016 mg
Vitaminium B2 (riboflavin)0.227 mg0.029 mg
Vitaminium B3 (Niacin)3.947 mg0.093 mg
Vitaminium B60.101 mg0.044 mg
Vitaminium B9 (Folic acid)0.089 mg0.005 mg
Vitaminium C0.2 mg2.3 mg
Vitaminium E0.04 mg1.68 mg
Vitaminium K0.006 mg0.05 mg

More Calories in Burger King hamburger

At first glance, you can see that in Burger King hamburger is more calories than in tatar sauce.

Burger King hamburger has 261 kcal per 100g and tatar sauce 211 kcal per 100g so it is pretty easy to calculate that the difference is about 24%.

Additionally, it is also easy to notice that most of the calories in Burger Bing hamburger cames from carbs and in tatar sauce from fat.

See tables below to compare Burger King hamburger with tatar sauce in details.

Burger King hamburger And Tatar sauce Nutrition Difference

  • Calories:
    Burger King hamburger - 24% more than tatar sauce
  • Carbohydrates:
    Burger King hamburger - 101% more than tatar sauce
  • Fat:
    tatar sauce - 58% more than Burger King hamburger
  • Dietary fiber:
    Burger King hamburger - 100% more than tatar sauce
  • Protein:
    Burger King hamburger - 1385% more than tatar sauce
  • Water:
    tatar sauce - 46% more than Burger King hamburger

More protein in Burger King hamburger

It is aslo easy to see see that in Burger King hamburger is more protein than in tatar sauce.

There is 1g per 100g of tatar sauce and 14.85g per 100g of Burger King hamburger so using simple math we can see that difference is about 1385%.

More carbohydrates in Burger King hamburger

In Burger King hamburger is more carbohydrates than in tatar sauce.

There is 13.3g/100g of carbohydrates in tatar sauce and 26.76g/100g in Burger King hamburger so let me do the math for you again - difference is about 101%.

Less fat in Burger King hamburger

In Burger King hamburger is less fats than in tatar sauce.

The tables above show us that there is 16.7g/100g of fats in tatar sauce and 10.55g/100g in Burger King hamburger. In this case difference is about 58%.

Burger (Burger King)

261kcal
  • Calories261
  • Carbohydrates26.76 g
  • Fat10.55 g
  • Dietary fiber1 g
  • Protein14.85 g
  • Water45.97 g
Burger (Burger King) calories per:
100g
| ounce | single piece

Calories source

  • 41% CARBS.
  • 23% PROTEIN
  • 36% FAT

Tartar sauce

211kcal
  • Calories211
  • Carbohydrates13.3 g
  • Fat16.7 g
  • Dietary fiber0.5 g
  • Protein1 g
  • Water67 g
Tartar sauce calories per:
100g
| ounce | tablespoon | teaspoon | cup | half cup

Calories source

  • 26% CARBS
  • 2% PROTEIN
  • 72% FAT

Vitamins: tatar sauce vs Burger King hamburger

  • Vitaminium B1 (Thiamine):
    Burger King hamburger - 1988% more than tatar sauce
  • Vitaminium B2 (riboflavin):
    Burger King hamburger - 683% more than tatar sauce
  • Vitaminium B3 (Niacin):
    Burger King hamburger - 4144% more than tatar sauce
  • Vitaminium B6:
    Burger King hamburger - 130% more than tatar sauce
  • Vitaminium B9 (Folic acid):
    Burger King hamburger - 1680% more than tatar sauce
  • Vitaminium C:
    tatar sauce - 1050% more than Burger King hamburger
  • Vitaminium E:
    tatar sauce - 4100% more than Burger King hamburger
  • Vitaminium K:
    tatar sauce - 733% more than Burger King hamburger

Minerals: Burger King hamburger vs tatar sauce

  • Calcium:
    Burger King hamburger - 192% more than tatar sauce
  • Iron:
    Burger King hamburger - 1048% more than tatar sauce
  • Magnessium:
    Burger King hamburger - 317% more than tatar sauce
  • Phosphorus:
    tatar sauce - 816% more than Burger King hamburger
  • Potassium:
    Burger King hamburger - 219% more than tatar sauce
  • Sodium:
    tatar sauce - 45% more than Burger King hamburger
  • Zink:
    tatar sauce - 816% more than Burger King hamburger
Marcin Piotrowicz
Author of this page
Marcin Piotrowicz

calories-info.com creator
Healthy diet and healthy lifestyle promoter

All information about nutrition on this website was created with help of information from the official United States Department of Agriculture database.

Add comment