Mackerel vs Tuna: Calories & Nutrition Showdown


Mackerel vs Tuna
Nutrition Facts
Serving size:
change
5g10g15g20g30g40g50g60g80g100g120g140g160g180g200g220g250g300g350g400g450g500g600g700g800g900g1000g
1oz2oz3oz4oz5oz6oz7oz8oz10oz12oz15oz20oz25oz30oz35oz40oz50oz
Amount Per Serving:
Serving size:
change
5g10g15g20g30g40g50g60g80g100g120g140g160g180g200g220g250g300g350g400g450g500g600g700g800g900g1000g
1oz2oz3oz4oz5oz6oz7oz8oz10oz12oz15oz20oz25oz30oz35oz40oz50oz
Amount Per Serving:
Mackerel vs Tuna 100g Compare
per 100g | Mackerel | Tuna |
---|---|---|
Calories | 205 | 144 |
Fat | 13.89 g | 4.9 g |
Protein | 18.6 g | 23.33 g |
Water | 63.55 g | 68.09 g |
Calcium | 12 mg | 8 mg |
Iron | 1.63 mg | 1.02 mg |
Magnessium | 76 mg | 50 mg |
Phosphorus | 5 mg | 5.7 mg |
Potassium | 314 mg | 252 mg |
Sodium | 90 mg | 39 mg |
Zink | 5 mg | 5.7 mg |
Vitaminium A | 167 µg | 2183 µg |
Vitaminium B1 (Thiamine) | 0.176 mg | 0.241 mg |
Vitaminium B2 (riboflavin) | 0.312 mg | 0.251 mg |
Vitaminium B3 (Niacin) | 9.08 mg | 8.654 mg |
Vitaminium B6 | 0.399 mg | 0.455 mg |
Vitaminium B9 (Folic acid) | 0.001 mg | 0.002 mg |
Vitaminium E | 1.52 mg | 1 mg |
When it comes to the ocean’s bounty, Mackerel and Tuna are two fish that often make it to our dining tables, offering not just delightful flavors but also a host of nutritional benefits. While both are celebrated for their taste and health advantages, they each bring something unique to the table. Let's dive deeper into the fascinating world of these two sea creatures, exploring their nutritional profiles and more, to understand what sets them apart.
Unveiling the Ocean's Marvels: Mackerel and Tuna
Mackerel and Tuna are known for their impressive presence in the world's oceans and their significant role in global cuisines. Mackerel, a smaller fish compared to tuna, is celebrated for its rich, oily flesh and is commonly found in both temperate and tropical seas. Tuna, on the other hand, ranges from the small skipjack to the majestic bluefin and is a prized catch in sport fishing and a staple in culinary traditions worldwide.
Both fish are not just culinary delights but also powerhouses of nutrition. Mackerel, for instance, is packed with omega-3 fatty acids, known for their heart-health benefits. Tuna, while leaner, offers a high protein content with minimal fat, making it a favorite among fitness enthusiasts.
A Closer Look at Nutritional Profiles
When comparing the nutritional content of Mackerel and Tuna, it's clear that both offer significant health benefits, albeit in different ways. Mackerel contains around 205 calories per 100 grams, with a higher fat content of 13.89 grams, including omega-3 fatty acids. It also boasts 18.6 grams of protein, making it a great source of lean protein.
Tuna, on the other hand, is leaner with 144 calories per 100 grams and a lower fat content of 4.9 grams. However, it impresses with a higher protein content of 23.33 grams, making it an excellent choice for those looking to increase their protein intake without consuming too much fat.
Both fish are devoid of carbohydrates and sugar, emphasizing their role in low-carb and ketogenic diets. Furthermore, they are rich in vitamins and minerals. Mackerel shines with its content of vitamin B3 (9.08 mg), while Tuna leads with a significant amount of vitamin A (2183 IU).
Heart Health and Beyond: The Benefits
The benefits of incorporating Mackerel and Tuna into your diet extend beyond just their macronutrient profiles. The omega-3 fatty acids in Mackerel are known for reducing inflammation, lowering blood pressure, and decreasing the risk of heart disease. Tuna's high protein content aids in muscle repair and growth, making it a go-to option for athletes and bodybuilders.
Moreover, both fish offer essential minerals such as magnesium, phosphorus, and potassium, which are vital for bone health, energy production, and maintaining heart rhythm. Their rich content of vitamins, especially those from the B-complex group, supports brain health and energy levels.
Choosing Between Mackerel and Tuna
Choosing between Mackerel and Tuna ultimately depends on your dietary preferences and nutritional needs. If you're looking for a fish that's rich in omega-3 fatty acids and don't mind the extra fat, Mackerel is an excellent choice. On the other hand, if you prefer a leaner fish with a higher protein content, Tuna might be more to your liking.
Regardless of your choice, both Mackerel and Tuna offer delicious ways to enrich your diet with essential nutrients. Whether grilled, baked, or served in a salad, these fish can provide both a taste sensation and a boost to your health.
In conclusion, Mackerel and Tuna each have their own set of benefits that make them valuable additions to a healthy diet. By understanding their nutritional profiles and health advantages, you can make informed choices that cater to your taste preferences and nutritional requirements, enjoying the best of what the ocean has to offer.
Mackerel 100g
205kcalCalories source
- 0% CARBS.
- 37% PROTEIN
- 63% FAT
Tuna 100g
144kcalCalories source
- 0% CARBS
- 68% PROTEIN
- 32% FAT
Compares of mackerel
- Mackerel vs Anchovy
- Mackerel vs Carp
- Mackerel vs Cod Fillet
- Mackerel vs Eel
- Mackerel vs Flounder
- Mackerel vs Herring
- see all compares of mackerel
Compares of tuna
Read also:
- Calories from Mackerel
- Calories of Smoked cheese
- Calories in Pepitas
- Biryani calories per 100g
- Bacardi rum protein per 100g
- How many calories does matcha have?
- Calories in a half of banana pudding
- Calories in whole banana pudding
- Calories for one, two or more banana pudding
- Calories in tablespoon of banana pudding
- How much protein in overnight oats?
Marcin Piotrowicz
calories-info.com creator
Healthy diet and healthy lifestyle promoter
Add comment